top of page

Most important civic duty Americans try to avoid

  • Writer: Robert Scott
    Robert Scott
  • May 12
  • 3 min read

Few things prompt more complaints than receiving a jury summons.


People worry about missing work, rearranging schedules or spending an entire day at the courthouse only to never make it into a courtroom. For many, jury duty feels like a burden added to an already busy life.


Jury duty still matters. It may matter more today than it has in decades.

At a time when trust in nearly every American institution is declining, jury service remains one of the few ways ordinary citizens directly participate in government.


Most Americans won’t hold public office, attend city council meetings or testify before the legislature. Many people do not even vote consistently in local elections.

However, when citizens report for jury service, they become part of the justice system itself.


According to the American Bar Association, roughly 15 million Americans are summoned for jury duty each year, yet participation rates continue to decline in many parts of the country. Some jurisdictions report response rates below 10%. In Ohio, a jury management survey cited by the Ohio Supreme Court found nearly one-third of summoned jurors failed to appear.


Jurors are asked to evaluate evidence, judge credibility and make decisions that can permanently affect another person’s life. In criminal cases, jurors may determine whether someone loses their freedom. In civil cases, they may decide financial disputes that can reshape families, businesses and careers.


The American legal system was intentionally designed this way.


The Founders distrusted concentrated government power. They believed citizens should serve as a safeguard against abuses by prosecutors, judges and government officials. That is why the right to a jury trial appears repeatedly in the Constitution and Bill of Rights.


Even today, juries serve as one of the few places where Americans from different backgrounds are required to work together toward a common decision.

Inside a jury room, political slogans and social media arguments tend to disappear quickly. Jurors must focus on evidence, listen carefully to one another and work toward a unanimous conclusion.


Courtrooms are one of the few remaining places where evidence still matters more than internet speculation or viral reactions.


Unfortunately, courts are finding it increasingly difficult to persuade citizens to serve.

Many people search for ways to avoid jury duty. Some ignore summonses altogether. Others openly admit they simply do not want to participate.


When large segments of the population avoid jury service, juries become less representative of the community. Certain groups like retirees, government employees or individuals with flexible work schedules often become overrepresented, while younger working adults and small business owners become more difficult to seat.


Over time, that imbalance can weaken public confidence in the fairness of verdicts.

Serving on a jury also changes how many citizens view the courts.


People who have never been inside a courtroom are often surprised by the seriousness of the process. They see the pressure placed on judges, attorneys, deputies, clerks, witnesses and victims. They realize legal disputes are usually more complicated than television dramas or movies.


Many jurors leave with a greater appreciation for both the justice system and their fellow citizens. Jurors routinely work together respectfully and thoughtfully. Complete strangers from entirely different backgrounds regularly manage to discuss difficult issues, evaluate evidence and reach consensus.


That may be one of the few remaining civic experiences in America where citizens are still expected to work through disagreement face-to-face.

None of this means jury duty is perfect.


Trials can be lengthy. Scheduling can create hardships for working families and small businesses. Juror compensation is often minimal. Courts continue to look for ways to improve efficiency and reduce unnecessary burdens.


Ironically, Americans still believe in the jury system itself. An American Bar Association survey found 78% of Americans consider juries the fairest way to determine guilt or innocence, while nearly seven in 10 called juries the most important part of the justice system.


One of the most direct forms of civic participation often arrives quietly in the mail as a jury summons.


Rob Scott, a Republican, is the Kettering Clerk of Court, an attorney and a small-business owner. Contact him at rob@robscott.us.

Comments


bottom of page